15 Non-Batman covers by Marshall Rogers

I’ve talked before on this blog about how Marshall Rogers drew some of the most iconic Batman comics… Now that Gotham Calling has a broader focus, however, I’ve decided to encorage you to bask in fifteen slick, wonderfully designed covers he did for all sorts of other properties.

Marshall Rogers was a true master of the form, able to put so much into a single image while still managing to convey a solid idea of the kind of reading experience you could expect to find inside each comic. His covers are defined by clarity, movement, and elegance. Moreover, not only did Rogers’ deft line and the easy grace of his figures often display a remarkable sense of balance, but he also had a delighful comedic touch, especially when it came to facial expressions.

doctor strange 49silver surfer 2mister miracle 20Spellbounddoctor strange 50The Shadowdetectives inc.justice league europe 20secrets of haunted house 26G.I. Joe 77Justice League Europe 21What the...? 16Scorpio Rosesilver surfer 8Justice League Europe 22

Posted in AWESOME COVERS | Tagged , | Leave a comment

2019’s book of the year

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

As I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, Gotham Calling’s 2019 book of the year is The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: The Tempest. There were other strong contenders, most notably the first volume of Chris Ware’s Rusty Brown, with its geometric meta-narratives that continuously rework the medium’s grammar, borrowing techniques from infographics, reductive art, and modernist literature in the service of devastating tales about ageing, alienation, and skeevy voyeurism. Yet I ended up going with this collection of the mini-series (plus a droll 4-page epilogue) that served as the apocalyptic culmination of Alan Moore’s and Kevin O’Neill’s esoteric tour-de-force linking all sorts of stories and characters from various media and genres across the ages. In part, I did it because Moore has announced his retirement from the medium he has so profoundly changed, so the book feels like a final conflicted love/hate letter to his origins.

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is not an easy series to plough through, so those who’ve made it this far probably know what they’re getting into. Whatever you love or hate about LOEG’s previous volumes, you’re likely to find it in The Tempest, only even more so. Picking up where Century: 2009 left off, this final volume kicks off with the series’ peculiar versions of Dracula’s Wilhelmina Murray, the protagonist of Virginia Woolf’s Orlando, and Emma Peel from The Avengers (the 1960s’ spy show, not Marvel’s super-team) being hunted by a rebooted James Bond, which eventually leads to an all-out war between fantasy and humanity (which may or may not be a metaphor for the ‘fake news’ era). As usual, there is plenty of mean comedy and such an omnivorous, insurmountable barrage of references that the best format for The Tempest would ideally be a web comic with hyperlinks to Jesse Nevins’ annotations.

Even the covers are chockful of in-jokes and allusions:

The Tempest     League of Extraordinary Gentlemen     The Tempest 5

I actually agree with some of the criticism that has been levelled at the series (like how LOEG mocks patriarchal Western imperialism while indulging in many of the attitudes and stereotypes that inform this ideology), which doesn’t mean I don’t get a kick out of it. I especially love the very eccentricity of the whole thing: LOEG is a messy postmodern satirical alternate history / mega-crossover comic book series aimed at extremely well-read adults that, like Alan Moore, share a passion for – and an encyclopedic knowledge of – both high culture and bawdy pulp fiction. You can add to this Kevin O’Neill’s and Ben Dimagmaliw’s lavish, unnaturalistic artwork and colors. And the fact that the series contains so much graphic and explicit sex – and not just for the standards of a comic initially distributed by a major mainstream publisher – that some of its entries (Black Dossier and Century, in particular) are essentially literate sex comics.

The result is a dense text, piling layers upon layers of fiction while telling a massively sprawling saga (in cast, geography, and chronology) through multiple formats: not just your average comic book storytelling, but also intricate prose (including the largely descriptive ‘New Traveller’s Almanac’ in volume II), 3-D sequences, poetry, cartoons, games, and advertisements. It’s also packed with surreal humor, like The Tempest’s hilarious flashback sequence in which Captain Universe fights an incarnation of the abstract concept of infinity (‘Merely to contemplate me has driven men mad!’).

The agenda of blurring the lines between high, middle, and lowbrow is close to my heart (as you can probably tell by some of the posts in this blog). Besides, at its best, all this takes the form of a fun and thrilling affair. And while some may complain that the fun and thrills rely on extensive previous knowledge, that’s missing the point: by this stage, LOEG has long left any pretentions it might have had (and which it probably never did have) of working as a more-or-less standalone adventure saga. Rather, it’s a comic *precisely* about the fun and thrills of intertextuality!

The Tempest 3

Although I didn’t know many of the secondary characters, I had a blast finding out more about them online and tracking down some of their original appearances (for all its backwards-looking attitude, LOEG is quite a twenty-first century reading experience, taking full advantage of the modern information age). It also made it even more gratifying every time the book did engage with works I was familiar with (ah, so that’s how Yevgwny Zamyatin’s dystopian novel We fits into this world… and even though they can’t say his actual name for copyright reasons, that’s definitely an older Brain Boy working with Captain Universe!).

It’s not just that the cast and concepts are borrowed from other works. Like they did in Black Dossier, Alan Moore and Kevin O’Neill fill The Tempest with formal pastiches. Once again, while ultra-versatile letterer Todd Klein perfectly mimics the fonts from different periods, O’Neill isn’t as chameleonic – his talent consists of evoking the various publishing traditions while fusing them with LOEG’s own distinctive style. The twist is that in The Tempest the primary dialogue is no longer just with literature and audiovisual fiction, but specifically with British comic books. Some of the subplots are told in the format of daily newspaper serials, literary adaptations from Classics Illustrated, photonovels, soccer comics, and 2000 AD strips, among many other riffs. There is even a tribute to reprints of Will Eisner’s The Spirit and EC Comics’ horror short stories:

The Tempest 5

Moreover, each issue is framed like one those 1960s’ magazines ripping off US superhero comics in black and white – or, as the fake letter column aptly puts it:

The Tempest

Besides being a pretext for Alan Moore and Kevin O’Neill to spoof the kind of material they read as kids (and which directly led to Moore’s first masterpiece, Marvelman), this framing device ties in neatly with The Tempest’s themes, both because some of the action involves a British group that’s a thinly-veiled knock-off of American super-teams and because the whole book’s leitmotif is a comment on the comic industry’s long history of exploitation and appropriation. From the onset, much of LOEG has been about exposing what classic fictional characters represented (colonialist ideals, repressed sexuality, etc), just like in Moore’s other intertextual opuses: the proudly pornographic Lost Girls and the Lovecraftian horror saga Providence. Here, though, his main target appears to be the very industry – its practices and underlying philosophy – behind the production of the original works. There is even a recurring opening feature called ‘Cheated Champions of Your Childhood’ denouncing the treatment of different creators in a parodic-yet-heartfelt tone.

As a result, we get not only a fitting end to the series, but a fitting end to the comic-writing journey of the mad genius from Northampton. Like Shakeaspere, Alan Moore closes his career with The Tempest (that play’s association with finality was also tapped by Neil Gaiman, who visited it in the final issue of his own metafictional fantasy epic The Sandman). Moore goes out trashing the archetypes that dominated twentieth-century comics (and today’s screens), cheekily responding to some of the criticism of his later work (especially in the final letter column), and settling countless old scores, like Marvelman’s forced change to Miraclemen (alluded to in the column above), DC’s refusal to include a recording of ‘Immortal Love‘ in Black Dossier, or his longstanding accusation that he was cheated out of the rights to Watchmen.

In a not-exactly-subtle jab at the biggest publishers in the field, he even presents us with a superhero retirement home full of moribund old characters/intellectual properties:

The tempest

Now, for the elephant in the room: some people see a contradiction in the fact that Moore has been so outspoken against what others have done with his creations while gleefully pillaging other creators’ babies in LOEG and treating them quite disrespectfully himself. I don’t think it’s quite comparable, though… From what I’ve seen online – which is not much, admittedly – his rants have more to do with the lack of imagination of writers who seem stuck on his old stories and the misinterpretation of his comics’ politico-literary agendas by movies like From Hell and V for Vendetta. There is a case to be made that a writer engaging with other people’s books in thoughtful and original ways isn’t the same as having a mega-corporation take rights away from creators and subsequently exploit their initial work through ill-conceived products that thrive on brand recognition.

From a consumer perspective, my main issue has always been that an abundance of uninspired ancillary products tends to taint the source material – both in my mind (all the extra baggage undermines the original’s purity in my memory) and in my favorite hobby, which is to recommend books to other people (even when having seen a lame adaptation doesn’t put people off from checking the original, knowing the story certainly lessens the impact of the subsequent reading experience). Sure, some texts are more sacred than others. I feel more protective of the perfectly self-contained Watchmen – with its stark authorial vision – than of serials that have been around in multiple interpretations since decades before I was born and whose original iteration isn’t all that brilliant (for all their klutzy charm, the most appealing thing about many early Superman comics is their function as urtext for later tales). The thing with Watchmen is that so much of what makes that book so special has to do with its formal experimentation, its radical departure from what came before, and its sophisticated political subtext, so attempts to mimic it without a comparable scope of ambition, innovation, or depth seem particularly pointless.

(Having finally caved in and watched Damon Lindelof’s bizarre Watchmen sequel TV show, though, I will give it kudos for at least taking the material in a truly unexpected direction, most notably with the focus on race and the Moore-ish twist on Hooded Justice. I liked some of the world-building around Redford’s liberal utopia, incorporating tensions rather than going for a simplistic anti-PC caricature (a la Black Science #41). The meta-parodies of Zack Snyder and Chris Nolan were not only cute, but pertinent – after all, if you’re reimagining audiovisual superheroes today, you have to engage with the genre’s evolution. That said, the abundant callbacks to the comic became more distracting than rewarding – and the safe, righteous ending was especially disappointing when compared to the original’s morally discomforting fantastic-solution-to-realistic-problem payoff.)

The truth is that Alan Moore has always been a master of revisionism, having kicked off his career with mind-blowing retcons of existing properties like Captain Britain, Marvelman, and Swamp Thing. Yet his revisions always added more than they took away: they expanded the characters’ potential and explored the underlying existentialist issues at their core, telling stories that felt poignant and fresh. LOEG has somehow taken this even further, retconning much of the pop culture canon in one glorious sweeping motion.

The Tempest

That said, The Tempest is unabashedly shaped by disenchantment. When a character explains that she came from the future, another one amusingly retorts: ‘There’s a future, other than just rebooting the 20th century forever? Wonders will never cease.’ Later on, you get statements like the one in the panels above (drawn in a style reminiscent of Eagle magazine), seemingly indicting Moore’s own fans, which reverses the spirit of Prospero’s closing monologue in Black Dossier – and, indeed, rather than a utopic celebration of fiction’s benign, aspirational role, Prospero’s Blazing World now comes across as utterly disturbing and threatening.

If Watchmen darkened superheroes by imbuing them with gritty, pretentious realism and if the America’s Best Comics line (where LOEG first got started) was at the forefront of a movement towards bringing lighthearted wonder back to comics, Alan Moore now seems to have come full circle, with a vociferous repudiation of escapist fantasy. It’s a curious balancing act, however, since The Tempest is built around winks to the inner circle, wallowing in nerdy arcana, playing with specific references (instead of generic tropes) and rewarding those who recognize most cameos (like in the splash with all the werewolves of London), implicitly challenging readers to look up other books.

This is what makes it such a fascinating object. Its bile is not the elitist contempt from smug outsiders, but the self-critical reappraisal of someone who has lived in this place (and, in fact, helped build large chunks of it) for decades and is trying to get everything out of his system before moving on. It brings to mind a passage from Jerusalem‘s chapter about Dave Daniels:

“At age thirteen, David’s idea of heaven was somewhere that comics were acclaimed and readily available, perhaps with dozens of big budget movies featuring his favourite obscure costumed characters. Now that he’s in his fifties and his paradise is all around him he finds it depressing. Concepts and ideas meant for the children of some forty years ago: is that the best that the twenty-first century has got to offer? When all this extraordinary stuff is happening everywhere, are Stan Lee’s post-war fantasies of white neurotic middle-class American empowerment really the most adequate response?”

The Tempest’s final issue drives the point home. A retired Sherlock Holmes posits his own criticism of the individualistic heroic ideal. When Captain Nemo’s great-grandson blows up his science-pirate island, he muses: ‘Put to the torch the soaring kingdom of my childhood, with all its marvels.’ Underneath all the gorgeous mayhem and gags, we are left with a provocative and very personal farewell by one of the greatest figures in the history of comics…

The Tempest 2

 

Posted in BOOKS OF THE YEAR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

COMICS CAN BE AWESOME (January 2020)

This year, Gotham Calling will continue to celebrate comics’ potential for awesomeness at the beginning of every month. To shake things up, however, instead of three jaw-dropping splash pages at a time, we’ll spotlight five kickass covers.

To be sure, many of these covers are better than the comics inside, whose stories don’t always live up to the premise on display (the inside art isn’t even necessarily by the same artists). Yet not only are the covers neatly designed, unabashedly weird (it’s often up there in the title!), and able to convey a whole set-up in a single image, they are also a testament to comics’ rich history of making us dream, quickly conjuring up a whole world of thrilling possibilities unconstrained by budget or by what is conventionally considered good taste…

Weird Mystery Tales 11Weird Fantasy 222000 ADSpace AdventuresFrom Beyond the Unknown

Posted in GLIMPSES INTO THE PAST | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Have a Gotham 2020

2020 Visions

Posted in GLIMPSES INTO THE FUTURE | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Spotlight on The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen – part 2

If you read the last post, you know what’s going on. This time around, let’s look at the set of volumes of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen dealing with the last hundred-years-or-so, starting with the bleak Century trilogy.

Century: 1910Century: 1910

Like with earlier volumes, Century’s overarching plot isn’t that hard to follow, consisting as it does of the League’s (particularly the trio of Mina Murray, Allan Quatermain, and Orlando) attempts to prevent the rise of an antichrist, thus tying up various cult-related works, from Aleister Crowley’s Moonchild to Ira Levin’s Rosemary’s Baby, plus a bunch of Michael Moorcock stories. Suitably, given the diversification of mass culture throughout the twentieth century, LOEG’s pool of allusions became more multimedia, with the series now increasingly pillaging cinema, music, and television. This is not to say that the selection became more mainstream, as it still covered a wide territory, ranging from the hippie exploitation flick Wild in the Streets to the satirical TV show The Thick of It.

Above all, I suppose it helps to have some vague awareness of at least a few core references: the first installment, set in 1910, mostly riffs on Bertolt Brecht’s and Kurt Weil’s play The Threepenny Opera (the scene above is supposed to be to the tune of ‘The Ballad of Mack the Knife’); the second issue, set in 1969, ties into a couple of British crime movies from that era (the gritty Get Carter and the avant-garde Performance) while recreating the concert from the documentary The Stones in the Park; the conclusion, set in 2009, viciously ravages the Harry Potter franchise. Moreover, because the League – initially still operated by the British secret services, but later under the command of Prospero from the Blazing World – has acquired such an intricate history, the comic becomes quite self-referential, so LOEG’s previous books are pretty much required reading as well.

Century is as much about society and politics as it is about fiction (LOEG’s point is precisely that they all go hand in hand), provocatively painting the twentieth century as a succession of real and imagined horrors piled up on the underprivileged. Alan Moore’s work has always been class-conscious – probably due to the weight of the writer’s own working-class background – even if it tends to veer closer to anarchism (the iconoclastic, deconstructive attitude) and mysticism (the recurring notion that ideas speak through humans) rather than Marxism (a traditional materialist analysis would posit ideas as the result of structural conditions and material contexts, more than the other way around). Yet Century is one of his most upfront comics in this regard. The first issue even finishes with an agitprop ‘musical’ number based on ‘What Keeps Mankind Alive?’

Century: 1910Century: 1910

(The second issue finishes with a punk-rock version of ‘The Ballad of Immoral Earnings’ called ‘Immoral Earnings (in the U.K.)’ that was actually recorded by The Indelicates!)

Honestly, I see in this move less a reflection of the twentieth century (which had no monopoly on class-based atrocities, especially when compared to the nineteenth century of LOEG’s earlier volumes) than a reaction to the twenty-first.  These comics came out between 2009 and 2012, under the shadow of the financial crisis, when some of the Old Left reacted to the rise of identity politics by preaching a return to class-based mobilization (identity issues like race and gender being considered not only divisive in the larger anti-capitalist struggle, but also dubious because younger activists increasingly valued them as intrinsic to individuals rather than criticize them as social constructs). In Jerusalem (part of which must’ve been written around this time), Moore’s alter-ego Alma Warren makes a point of stressing her belief in the primacy of economic status at the hierarchy of social discrimination: ‘Her point is that despite very real continuing abuses born of anti-Semitism, born of racism and sexism and homophobia, there are MPs and leaders who are female, Jewish, black or gay. There are none who are poor. There never have been, and there never will be.’

Not that Moore is a stranger to intersectionality. No matter how problematic you may find LOEG’s use of racialized characters like Fu Manchu and Golliwog, Moore’s body of work has repeatedly conveyed a deep appreciation of how discourse and ideals – including depictions and prejudices – shape the world. (From the same chapter of Jerusalem: ‘As Alma sees things, it’s the metaphors that do all the most serious damage: Jews as rats, or car-thieves as hyenas. Asian countries as a line of dominoes that communist ideas could topple. Workers thinking of themselves as cogs in a machine, creationists imagining existence as a Swiss watch mechanism and then presupposing a white-haired and twinkle-eyed old clockmaker behind it all.’) His renewed emphasis on old-school class politics therefore makes more sense if seen in the context of the current era of the so-called culture wars.

Likewise, in the final issue – 2009 – there is a tinge of nostalgia for past eras (personified by Allan Quatermain) that only makes sense if seen as a frustration with the present, since LOEG’s initial spirit was clearly one of denouncing old-fashioned adventures as having whitewashed Victoriana’s background of poverty, colonialism, and all sorts of conservative values.

Century: 2009Century: 2009

Moore verges very closely to the stereotype of the cranky old man complaining about kids today. Harry Potter (who literally pisses on Quatermain) is elected as the main target, which can be outrageously funny, but it also comes across as bitter (‘This whole environment seems artificial, as if it’s been constructed out of reassuring imagery from the 1940s…’). As a result, a new set of critics turned against the series – no longer the ones daunted by LOEG’s expansive referentiality, but those who engaged with it and didn’t like what they found beneath the surface, exposing 2009 as the erudite version of a reactionary blogger ranting about how the pop culture he grew up with was better than this generation’s. (One of the most scathing, yet thought-provoking, critiques came from Marc Singer, in Breaking the Frames: Populism and Prestige in Comics Studies.)

There are other ways in which Century spoke to the present through the past. In one of LOEG’s most fanciful bits of reverse-engineering, the prose sections at the end placed the ancestors from characters of the Baltimore-set shows Homicide: Life on the Street and The Wire on the moon, thus linking their genealogy to the Baltimore Gun Club’s space program (from Jules Verne’s From the Earth to the Moon). Moreover, the 2005 bombings in London loomed over the series, from the attack and panic at the climax of 1910 to the many cryptic allusions made by the time-travelling Prisoner of London (from Ian Sinclair’s Slow Chocolate Autopsy).

Century: 2009Century: 2009

(I actually chose this excerpt because of the reference to From Hell’s insulting film adaptation, further illustrating the sheer amount of deep cuts that are *all over* this comic.)

At the end of the day, although mean-spirited, borderline incomprehensible in places, and often making you feel dirty inside, Century is still a pretty entertaining mess. I quite like the way O’Neill and Moore experiment with rhythm by repeatedly syncing the narrative to musical cues (for example, 1969’s trippy climax should be read to the tune of the Rolling Stones’ ‘Sympathy for the Devil’). Also, the artwork continues to be freaking awesome:

Century: 1969Century: 1969

The following trio of books went back to a more lighthearted style, telling straightforward yarns pitting Captain Nemo’s badass daughter (which Century had established as The Threepenny Opera’s Pirate Jenny) against Queen Ayesha from H. Rider Haggard’s novel She (and from numerous film adaptations, most notably 1935’s atmospheric gothic fantasy produced by Merian C. Cooper) in the 1920s, 1940s, and 1970s. Moore and O’Neill even dialed down the sexual content, at least compared to the ultra-smutty Century.

That said, the references in the Nemo comics are even more idiosyncratic: in Heart of Ice, Charles Foster Kane puts together a team of lesser-known Edisonade adventurers; The Roses of Berlin teams up characters from German expressionistic cinema with the ersatz-Hitler of Charles Chaplin’s The Great Dictator; the climax of River of Ghosts brings together the schlocky anti-Nazi thriller The Boys from Brazil and the goofy Bond spoof Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine.

My favorite of the lot is The Roses of Berlin, obviously reflecting my own taste as a film buff. It’s not just the geeky fun of watching Captain Nemo go up against Dr. Mabuse, Dr. Caligari, and the robot from Metropolis, but also the awe of seeing Kevin O’Neill and colorist Ben Diagmaliw successfully reinvent themselves once again… If their visuals in 1969 seemed filtered through hallucinogenic drugs and a ‘summer of love’ vibe, here they have the dark, stark brutality of a totalitarian nightmare.

Nemo: The Roses of BerlinNemo: The Roses of Berlin

A final word on sex. LOEG has gained a reputation for the way it abundantly sexualizes popular characters and their stories. Indeed, sex is a big part of the series (and, let’s face it, of pretty much all of Alan Moore’s work). As LOEG progressed, sex increasingly dripped from almost every single page in one way or another, to the point of self-parody in Black Dossier and Century… In the former, the framing sequences with Mina Murray and Allan Quatermain on the run involve as much nudity, horniness, and copulation as the dossier’s more explicitly erotic material (like its sequel to Fanny Hill), which I suppose could be seen as a way of illustrating the merging of fiction and reality.

Moreover, those who accuse Moore of overusing sexual violence across his work will surely find themselves vindicated here. LOEG’s debut issue doesn’t last six pages before the first attempted rape and the second issue revolves around a particularly surreal assault (one that is brutally inverted later in the series). Subsequent volumes feature plenty more, with even some of the main cast (men and women) getting attacked at various points, as sexual violence is treated both seriously and humorously (in line with LOEG’s overall darkly comedic tone). To be fair, this isn’t just a trope: the barrage of violence (sexual and otherwise) serves to expose widespread phenomena hidden by – or implicit in – the original stories. Notably, James Bond’s predatory exploits are rendered in a deliberately unpleasant fashion, unsubtly deglamorizing his toxic masculinity.

Likewise, the depictions of more benign, pleasurable, and consensual sex aren’t always gratuitous. For instance, they play a central role in the characterization of Mina’s and Allan’s relationship – through sex, we see their initial attraction, lasting passion, and gradual boredom. This is complicated by the sex-changing Orlando, with whom they develop a polyamorous open relationship with a varying gender balance.

Century: 1969Century: 1969

Interestingly, the different ways each character adjusts to immortality are expressed sexually. For instance, Mina, who tries to keep up with the times, feels increasingly frustrated with Allan, which affects their relationship. In turn, Orlando, who has been basking in immortality for centuries, has settled into it and always feels like having a nice time.

Century: 1969Century: 1969

Still, other times the lewdness seems more forced. Nemo’s accompanying text pieces are supposedly written by reporter Hildy Johnson (from Howard Hawk’s His Girl Friday) as a lascivious, bisexual alcoholic, which feels quite out-of-character for her.

The truth is that LOEG’s abundant lecherous content doesn’t always seem subordinate to a specific point. Indeed, if I was to look for a larger gesture here, I guess it would be, not necessarily to celebrate sexual liberation in short-sighted terms (as suggested by Eric Berlatsky), but to liberate sex from a fixed meaning: Moore’s attitude seems to be that sex in fiction, like in real life, doesn’t always require a purpose other than itself. In other words, asides from conveying the complex, extensive, and sometimes horrible role of sex in popular culture, perhaps one of the reasons there is so much of it in this comic is also just a sense of raunchy fun.

To be fair, titillation (especially via a male gaze) has traditionally been a key component of the kind of pulpy landscape LOEG came to occupy. You can hardly tell the story of the modern sci-fi, fantasy, and adventure genres without acknowledging their lurid predilection for muscled men and big-bosomed women…

amazing ghost stories Planet Comics eerie

It doesn’t mean you have to emulate it, of course, even if LOEG – for all its revisionism and grotesquerie – has always contained an element of homage, blowing up Alan Moore’s many influences by channeling them through a ludicrously exaggerated style. Ultimately, the series’ perverse glee comes not so much from lowering acclaimed literature to the standards of trashy sexploitation, but from presenting a continuum between the two levels, gradually making it seem natural that an Irish mythological hero would star in what is presumably a tribute to Russ Meyer’s filmography:

Nemo: River of GhostsNemo: River of Ghosts

In a couple of weeks, I’ll discuss how LOEG’s final book brought this fascinating series to an end while living up to its standards of intertextual insanity and ribaldry.

Posted in WEBS OF FICTION | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Spotlight on The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen – part 1

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

If Master Race and other stories was Gotham Calling’s 2018 book of the year, this time around that questionable honor goes to The Tempest, the collection that marks the ending – twenty years after the first issue came out – of the violent, depraved, and flawed-yet-very-entertaining metafictional series The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Before going into The Tempest in some depth, though, let us look back on one of the medium’s most ambitious narrative experiments.

LOEG’s twofold premise is that 1) every single character in the series – including background extras – is borrowed from other works of fiction (mostly genre literature) and 2) every major literary work kind of fits into the same byzantine continuity. Because the comic is drawn by Kevin O’Neill, the art is gorgeously stylized. And because the whole thing is written by Alan Moore, you can stretch the definition of ‘major literary work’ to include pretty much everything you can think of, whether it’s Homer’s Odyssey or Winnie-the-Pooh. The result is basically an extreme version of the Wold Newton Universe.

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (v2) #5The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (v2) #5

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is one of Alan Moore’s most contested masterpieces. All of his greatest works (Watchmen, V for Vendetta, From Hell, Miracleman, Swamp Thing) are challenging reads in terms of form and content, but they are also indisputably rewarding to anyone willing to engage with them. While the same can be said about LOEG, several critics seem frustrated over the fact that the ratio is somewhat different, i.e. even if you can get a lot out of it, there are just so many damn references – and some of them so obscure – that you’re not likely to grasp *every aspect* of the series, no matter how much effort you put in! (This penchant for ever-more demanding eclecticism has become a staple of Moore’s later period, reaching an apex in his colossal novel Jerusalem.)

I can see the point of that criticism, especially from readers used to fully decipherable books, but I don’t identify with it – for me, LOEG is a comic that keeps on giving, not only because it is rich with clever details and captivating themes, but also because I find myself revisiting bits of it with renewed appreciation every time I come across any of the many works referenced in the series. Like the fact that some of the dialogue is in untranslated foreign languages (ranging from Dutch to Punjabi, plus a made-up Martian language that you have to decipher with the help of a mirror), the endless referentiality is all part of the challenge!

Ironically, some of the critics’ anger may derive from the fact that LOEG did ease readers in with a rather smooth start, ushering in misleading expectations… The first couple of volumes were mostly straightforward adventure tales about a secret team of British agents in the 1890s, with a neat steampunk vibe, albeit peppered with Moore’s flair for deconstructing archetypes (the leading characters actually spent a lot of the time at each other’s throats). In line with the rest of the America’s Best Comics line, in which Moore mined literary traditions beyond superheroes for different approaches to heroic fantasy (Tom Strong drew on the pulps, Promethea on mythology, Greyshirt on Eisner’s The Spirit…), LOEG was essentially a revisionist homage to the rousing yarns of the eighteen hundreds.

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen 1     League of Extraordinary Gentlemen v2     League of Extraordinary Gentlemen II

It also helped that the members of the original roster – Mina Murray (from Dracula), Captain Nemo (from 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and The Mysterious Island), Allan Quatermain (from King Solomon’s Mines and its sequels), Henry Jekyll/Edward Hyde (from Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde), and Hawley Griffin (from The Invisible Man), led by a character from the Sherlock Holmes books – were generally well-known in Western pop culture. The same goes for the (admittedly nerdier) choices in the delightfully ornate prose story in the back matter, with Quatermain meeting John Carter of Mars and the protagonist of H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine, as well as Randolph Carter (from H.P. Lovecraft’s stories). The second volume revolved mostly around H.G. Wells’ The War of the Worlds, eventually crossing over with the same author’s The Island of Doctor Moreau.

All in all, there was still a relatively limited amount of luggage required to follow the main plot in these first couple of volumes. The remaining references then worked as a bonus – for instance, you didn’t have to be familiar with Edgar Allan Poe’s ‘The Murders in the Rue Morgue’ or Jules Verne’s Five Weeks in a Balloon beforehand, but, if you were, you’d get even more enjoyment out of the proceedings. And although the extensive prose pieces in the back matter already pointed to Moore’s increasing ambition of building a coherent universe out of everything he’d ever read, I guess fans didn’t mind as long as this didn’t get in the way of O’Neill’s pretty pictures. After all, these were two masterful storytellers who knew just how to frame and pace set pieces for maximum effect (like the way they kept giving us a sense of Griffin’s movements while keeping him invisible, without resorting to the usual ‘semi-transparent’ effects).

The fact that the main cast and concepts were in the public domain and had already been popularized in countless media adaptations made them accessible even to people who hadn’t actually read the classics, allowing the series to build up on previously established characterization.

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen #3The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen #3

Although LOEG went into some seriously dark places (especially regarding Griffin and Hyde), the comic was also, from the outset, unabashedly funny. Besides the many in-jokes and Easter Eggs (Moore’s scripts must have been as detailed as those he did for Top 10), the credits, blurbs, and extra material framed the comic as an actual ‘Boys’ Picture Monthly’ published in late 19th century England, including tongue-in-cheek warnings such as ‘Mothers of sensitive or neurasthenic children may wish to examine the contents before passing it on to their little one, removing those pages which they consider to be unsuitable.’ Some issues even contained authentic vintage advertisements, including one for a vaginal syringe called Marvel which DC recalled out fear that it could trigger litigation from Marvel Comics (this was one of the reasons Moore shifted LOEG to a different publisher, along with an incident regarding the by-all-accounts dumbed-down film adaptation of the comic).

The pastiche in these extras often veered into outright absurdist humor. This is from the authors’ bio section in one of the collected editions: ‘MR. KEVIN O’NEILL commenced his career as a pugilist in 1859. Due to excessive drinking and repeated cerebral splintering during an early bout with Walter Phibbs, the Widnes Goliath, O’Neill passed into an insensible state from which he was never fully to awaken. However, in 1885, doctors discovered that by attaching galvanising cables directly to the comatose prize-fighter’s brain, his right hand could be made to delineate exquisite and fanciful illustrations, such as his well-known series “Modern Times, or, The Progress of a Scented Nonce,” and, of course, his scandalous “Queen Victoria and Emily Pankhurst Girl-on-Girl Novelty Flipbook.”’

In particular, Moore had a blast poking fun at the era’s rampant racism and sexism. One of the running jokes involved the contrast between, on the one hand, the over-the-top misogyny displayed by most of the cast (and by the Victorian narrator) and, on the other hand, the fact that Mina Murray was clearly the most capable character around. Indeed, apart from her and the opium-addicted Quatermain, practically everybody was a psycho…

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen #1The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen #1The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen #1

That said, you could see Moore gradually stretching the playing field. There were allusions to previous leagues, headed by Prospero and Gulliver. LOEG’s second volume included a super-dense appendix, titled ‘The New Traveller’s Almanac,’ which sought to map out an imaginary geography stringing together all the masterworks of fantastic literature (with the exception of José Saramago’s Baltasar and Blimunda), throwing in some surrealist films as well (Duck Soup, Yellow Submarine… even The Big Lebowski!). Although Moore’s prose is always a treat, I admit the main appeal of this travelogue was figuring out the references (look, it’s Fenwick from The Mouse that Roared and Quiquendone from A Fantasy of Dr. Ox!), as there wasn’t much of a narrative thread (even if Moore did bury a key plot point for later arcs between the lines of the section on Africa). Still, I cannot help but geek out when coming across a page that crams together allusions to Candide, One Hundred Years of Solitude, and Goldfinger!

The big turning point in LOEG’s acclaim came with the graphic novel Black Dossier, where the balance between action and parodic pastiche shifted considerably. The driving story found Mina Murray and Allan Quatermain in 1958, after the collapse of George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four dictatorship (which was thus recontextualized from the titular future into the early Cold War, syncing that book’s timeline with the era that conceived it), but this turned out to be a mere framing device, as the bulk of Black Dossier was a collection of scattered documents from the League’s secret history. Although there was obvious symbolism in the way the heroes gradually escaped into the realm of imagination (here called ‘The Blazing World,’ after Margaret Cavendish’s utopia), their saga became secondary to a bunch of bizarre literary mash-ups, approaching Lovecraft’s Cthulhu mythos by channeling P.G. Wodehouse’s witty turns of phrase (‘I burst in, in high dudgeon, and prepared to give this idler Peabody a fair piece of my mind, of which I have a good few pieces left to spare, despite what everyone who knows me cares to say upon the topic.’) or Jack Kerouac’s and William S. Burroughs’ beatnik stream of consciousness (‘…alla rest o these primordial yeggs n cosmic dregs n anti matter bums n beggars can seep in yer scooped out skull lay eggs ad jingle caviar control bugs slaver ants is what they are got wiretaps on yer daydreams sex schemes holy blazin visions in their dogditch convict searchlight beams n all yoomanity’ll soon be pressin levers in its ratbox gitting monkeyshocks…’).

Many readers then turned on the series, accusing it of pretentious navel-gazing and of betraying the initial promise of more-or-less conventional fun. (If any of those readers is reading this, stop moaning and go check out Ian Edginton’s own shared comic universe, especially Stickleback and Ampney Crucis Investigates, which draw on the same type of influences without straying as far afield.) Another strain of criticism attacked the comic’s rehabilitation of the children’s character Golliwog, now rightly considered a cringeworthy racial stereotype.

While LOEG may have grown into something that wasn’t exactly what the original fans craved, it also interestingly grew into something that its creators felt truly passionate about. You can sense the care and thought and joy writer and artist put onto each page (which is more than you can say about most long-running comic book series). The same goes for colorist Ben Dimagmaliw and for letterers Bill Oakley and Todd Klein, who got to stretch their muscles through a variety of artefacts, such as a pornographic pamphlet from Nineteen Eighty-Four’s Pornsec (where the characters talk in Newspeak) and a set of postcards sent by Mina and Allan from around the world. And don’t even get me started on the comic-within-a-comic – emulating the historical strips that appeared in 1950s’ British comics – retconning Virginia Woolf’s Orlando: A Biography:

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen - Black DossierBlack Dossier

Not that the authors were the only ones having a good time: although it’s tempting to accuse LOEG of merely applying to the literary canon the kind of fanboyish continuity OCD that dominates superhero comics, I think that’s missing the point… Yes, this is masturbatory fanfic, but it’s masturbatory fanfic written by Alan Moore, which means that it’s done on an unprecedented, mind-bending scope. You don’t have to recognize every single deity in the theological treaty ‘On the Descent of Gods’ – or to recognize its author as W. Somerset Maugham’s caricature of Aleister Crowley (who goes on to play a large role in the next book) – to be blown away by the way Moore ties together all sorts of mythologies, both historically worshipped (biblical, Greco-Roman) and admittedly fictional (by the likes of Robert E. Howard and Michael Moorcock).

Granted, the meticulous world-building and in-your-face name-dropping can get tiresome in places. Yet I think it’s a gross exaggeration to argue, like some do, that LOEG as a whole became little more than a spot-the-reference game, Family Guy-style, where pleasure derives only from recognition. For one thing, Moore’s wit and O’Neill’s retro, angular visuals often kept things pretty enjoyable on their own terms, even if you don’t feel like checking out Jess Nevins’ comprehensive annotations.

Sure, Black Dossier gets better the more familiar you are with the diverse source material. And sure, not all of it is going to do it for you in the same way, as sometimes you may find yourself admiring the authors’ boldness, intelligence, and craftmanship rather than emotionally succumbing to the final product’s charm.  However, the book still works on multiple levels. While part of the appeal of the Shakespearean play ‘Faerie’s Fortunes Founded’ is contemplating Moore’s skill at mimicking the Bard’s iambic pentameter, we get more than an SNL-like empty impersonation: on the one hand, Queen Gloriana’s words foreshadow later developments and reveal an in-story reason for the League’s creation (to knit the realms of humans and gods) which doubles as a thematic statement; on the other hand, the wordplay is itself quite amusing, like when Orlando explains that he is (currently) a man while repeatedly alluding to testicles in his word choices:

Black Dossierleague of extraordinary gentlemenBlack Dossier

(We later see a performance of this play in the Blazing World, in LOEG: The Tempest.)

Plus, the riffs and references aren’t just self-indulgent winks… From the outset, LOEG’s clever merging of narratives served to comment on the obsessions and violence of the culture that spawned them in the first place, so that underneath the superficial thrills there was always plenty of rich subtext to explore, not to mention several layers of moral complexity. Moreover, as argued by Jeff Thoss, there is a poignant historiographical gesture in the series’ resurrection of comics’ affinities with paraliterary traditions going back to the nineteenth century, as it invites readers to envision a new genealogy of the comic book medium itself.

Notably, Moore kept revisiting his pet concerns, including posthuman transcendence and the power of ideas. His work has often dealt with the connection between these two themes, not only through drugs (also addressed in LOEG), but through the escapist, emancipatory potential of imagination. Going radically beyond a mere poststructuralist acknowledgment that language frames perception, Moore has made an illustrious career out of ‘mind over matter’ imagery. It’s not just Gloriana who speaks of bridging reality and myth – in Black Dossier’s psychedelic closing sequence (in 3-D!), Prospero further underlines that one of the book’s major themes is the impact of fiction itself. In one of those beautiful monologues Moore can do so well, a fourth-wall-breaking Prospero (whose long beard gives him a Moore-ish look) points out that, just as humanity created stories (like the ones in LOEG), it was also shaped by them, drawing inspiration from their ideals. ‘On dream’s foundation matter’s mudyards rest. Two sketching hands, each one the other draws: the fantasies thou’ve fashioned fashion thee.’

(Between his baroque prose and naughty playfulness, Alan Moore’s style has always reminded me of Umberto Eco, who also explored the whole fiction-shapes-reality motif, particularly in the brilliant Baudolino. Although less caustic, Jorge Luis Borges and Italo Calvino come to mind as well, so I was not surprised to find plenty of allusions to these authors’ writings in ‘The New Traveller’s Almanac.’)

In the next post, I’ll discuss how Moore and the rest of the gang continued to expand this project through a set of books that approached the fictional history of the twentieth century by somehow amping up LOEG’s level of nastiness and debauchery. If you thought Black Dossier didn’t go easy on readers, wait until you see what comes next…

Century 1910Century: 1910
Posted in WEBS OF FICTION | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Taking a break… (December 2019)

Legends of the Dark Knight #195Legends of the Dark Knight #195
Posted in GOTHAM INTERLUDES | Tagged , | Leave a comment

COMICS CAN BE AWESOME (December 2019)

And here is your December reminder that comics can be awesome:

Tokyo Ghost #2Tokyo Ghost #2
Cemetery Beach #1Cemetery Beach #1
Wild Blue Yonder #3Wild Blue Yonder #3
Posted in GLIMPSES INTO THE FUTURE | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Spotlight on Fury: My War Gone By

fury max

2012’s limited series Fury: My War Gone By is the kind of idiosyncratic, fascinating beast you get in the field of comics, bizarrely merging auteurism-ran-loose with a popular corporate franchise in the form of provocative historical fiction. It’s not just that writer Garth Ennis chose to explore the Cold War through the version of Colonel Nick Fury he had crafted ten years earlier, it’s also that he indulged in so many of his disparate interests and tastes that the ensuing tone is all over the place, appealing to a relatively specific combination of sensibilities (which I happen to share), as My War Gone By veers between sentimentality, detailed military discussion, high politics, and lowbrow comedy, including plenty of explicit language and graphic sexuality.

Fury MaxFury: My War Gone By #4

It helps that the whole creative team seems to be on the same page. Artist Goran Parlov always has a nice rapport with Ennis, his page-wide horizontal panels and his exuberant, not-quite-cartoony lines perfectly matching the Irishman’s caustic scripts. The colors are by the great Lee Loughridge, who gives the light in each corner of the world a specific texture, nailing the series’ wide range of moods. Moreover, Dave Johnson’s super-stylish, conceptual covers give off just the right hint of James Bond while making it increasingly clear that this is a separate breed of Cold War fiction. (The issues’ titles are likewise based on intertextual winks, calling back to lines from a variety of thematically-related works, such as poems, novels, films, and even a couple of kickass Pogues tracks… The title of issue #9 ironically alludes to the lyrics of the theme-song from The Spy Who Loved Me.)

It’s a bleak, ferocious series (if you’re just looking for a breezy romp set in a revised version of Marvel’s Cold War, go look for it in Kathryn Immonen’s and Rich Ellis’ Agent Carter: Operation S.I.N. instead). The structure is rather episodic, each three-part arc engaging with a crisis from a different decade. The first arc takes place in 1954 Indochina, around the time of the Battle of Dien Bien Phu. It introduces the main recurring characters (who represent distinct attitudes towards the Cold War), namely the hawkish congressman Pug McCuskey, his cynical bombshell secretary Shirley Defabio, and idealist C.I.A. operative George Hatherly – the latter, I assume, being a nod to Alden Pyle in Graham Greene’s classic novel The Quiet American (which, notoriously, was quite different from the character in 1958’s noirish film adaptation).

Fury: My War Gone By #1Fury: My War Gone By #1Fury: My War Gone By #1

This arc sets up the series’ themes, most notably the notion that the so-called Cold War was made up of plenty of hot conflicts, with dead bodies piling up all over the Third World as the U.S. embarked in morally and strategically questionable foreign interventions (in this case, supporting French colonialism) in the name of global anti-communism. It also neatly sets up a later arc, with the look on Nick Fury’s bloody face during the climactic battle suggesting his precocious realization that the West doesn’t stand a chance in the region (which of course doesn’t stop him from fighting in Vietnam in the following decade). The ending of issue #3 powerfully conveys that this is a whole new type of warfare with a fiercer enemy than the one in WWII.

Leaving little doubt about the spirit of moral compromise to come, Fury teaches Hatherly ‘the facts of life’ as they literally fight side-by-side with a Nazi.

Fury: My War Gone By #2Fury: My War Gone By #2

The second arc finds Colonel Fury in 1961, training troops for the Bay of Pigs invasion. If you know this version of Fury, you know he doesn’t like staying away from the battlefield (‘I keep training men I never see again for wars I never fight in.’), which is why he jumps at the chance of heading a secret mission to Cuba. His team arrives there just in time to witness first-hand the C.I.A.’s infamous clusterfuck … (Issue #6, which deals with the operation’s aftermath, is one of the most brutal ones in the whole series.)

We then skip to 1970 Vietnam, where Nick Fury goes on a covert operation with Frank Castle (years before the latter became the Punisher), i.e. the one guy who is just as addicted to combat as him. Garth Ennis has a long history of writing Castle and he has a firm, captivating grip on the character (‘He seems to come from that time in America when things were made just to work.’). Plus, Vietnam war comics are exactly the sort of thing Ennis and Parlov seem born to do (fortunately, they went on to collaborate again in the excellent Punisher: The Platoon).

Fury: My War Gone By #7Fury: My War Gone By #7Fury: My War Gone By #7

If you don’t count the one-issue epilogue, the final arc takes place in 1984 Nicaragua, where Colonel Fury investigates the charge that the C.I.A. is involved in drug-smuggling in order to fund the Contra rebels against the Sandinistas (besides training them to carry out unspeakable atrocities). This leads Fury to Barracuda, the cunning S.O.B. Ennis and Parlov introduced years earlier in The Punisher MAX and who starred in their spin-off mini-series Punisher Presents: Barracuda (a failed attempt at a Blaxploitation action comedy that isn’t nearly as cool or as fun as the original Blaxploitation action comedies, like Truck Turner or Foxy Brown).

Fury: My War Gone By #11Fury: My War Gone By #11

It’s hard to deny Barracuda comes across like a particularly outrageous racist stereotype, but his function in My War Gone By is, I suppose, to drive home the point that the line between black ops and organized crime can get increasingly blurry. As one character puts it, Barracuda is the embodiment of the kind of unchecked power that comes with fighting secret wars.

The indictment of the ascent of covert operations is, of course, at the core of the book, along with the idea that some entities – be they the intelligence community, the military-industrial complex, or Fury himself – are willing to find any pretext to carry on fighting. At one point, a Vietnamese general tells the protagonist: ‘Don’t pretend that this is your old war, your European cataclysm wherein Good triumphs over Evil. Be honest: you are here because for Nick Fury, any war will do.’

That is one of many fine passages in a book with a lot of memorable Garth Ennis dialogue, especially between characters who can closely understand and see through each other. Ennis also trusts readers to pick up when the cast betrays their narrow views in light of what we now know about how history panned out…

Fury: My War Gone By #4Fury: My War Gone By #4

In part, Shirley Defabio steals the show. A force of nature who grows gradually disenchanted with what’s going on, her relationship with Nick Fury starts off as preposterous male fantasy wish fulfillment but gains depth along the way…

Fury: My War Gone By #7Fury: My War Gone By #7

(This is one of a couple of touching scenes involving Shirley Defabio on a balcony… Perhaps they can be seen as giving a new, retroactive meaning to Nick Fury’s own balcony scenes in the initial Fury MAX mini-series.)

With characterization playing such a central role, My War Gone By gets significant mileage out of sharing some of its cast with other Ennis comics, which is both fan-pleasing and a way to elevate the impact of Nick Fury’s saga by placing it in a large meta-narrative. At the same time, though, the book removes Fury from the even larger meta-narrative of the canonical Marvel Universe, as it outright contradicts the original Nick Fury, Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. comics, replacing them as the true past of this version of the character (for one thing, this Fury spent the 1960s-1980s working for the C.I.A., not for S.H.I.E.L.D.).

I have no problem with that, even if I think the gesture takes away some of the edge of the first Fury MAX mini… Much like Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns, that series was not meant to present a fully alternative version of its protagonist. Rather, the idea was to build on the contrast with each hero’s campy history by showing us an older, darker, and twisted version of a previously colorful world – much of the fun of DKR and Fury MAX hinges precisely on the notion that this is supposed to be the same Batman who had all those goofy adventures and the same Fury who used all those weird-looking gadgets back in the day. However, in both cases the comics’ success eventually led to prequels that recreated the past, making it more consistent with their new depictions (the Caped Crusader was unluckier than Fury, because he got settled with the dreadful All-Star Batman & Robin, the Boy Wonder). Ironically, introducing more revision reduced the original revisionism.

Regardless, this version of Nick Fury is such a strong character that his memoirs do serve as a great springboard to unleash Garth Ennis’ acidic take on the Cold War.

Fury: My War Gone By #4Fury: My War Gone By #4Fury: My War Gone By #4
Posted in SPYCRAFT & WARFARE | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chuck Dixon’s mordant Batman

Last week I mentioned that Chuck Dixon is an old-school pro whose work in Batman comics (especially during his most prolific period, in the 1990s), rather than blow up the status quo, was all about gripping narratives that stayed true to the characters. Yet it can be misleading to think of him as a mere journeyman who has mastered meat-and-potatoes storytelling. There is also a caustic side to Dixon’s authorial voice, including a penchant for corrosive comedy and biting social commentary. This has enabled him to engage with personal idiosyncrasies like his film tastes and political views.

Catwoman (v2) #29Catwoman (v2) #29

I’ve written before about Chuck Dixon’s key contribution to our ability to imagine Gotham City’s cinema culture. This no doubt stems from the fact that Dixon is a film buff – one who not only borrows plenty of ideas from the movies, but who also infuses that passion into the world he creates. In Robin Annual #1 (the coolest issue of the lame Bloodlines crossover), Dixon introduced the Psyba-Rats, a team of teen techno-thieves that included the mutant Channelman, who enters television systems and tweaks Hollywood classics. One of the best friends of Tim Drake (Robin’s civilian identity) was a geek called Sebastian Ives who loved schlocky sci-fi flicks (leading to a fun sequence at a drive-in, in Batman versus Predator III). Detective Harvey Bullock’s obsession with old movies played a role in the one-shot Bullock’s Law. Plus, although it’s not explicit, I’m convinced the characters in Bane: Conquest keep quoting one-liners from Commando

And then there is Detective Comics #671-673, where the Joker gets funding to do a film in which he actually kills Batman (because Hollywood producers are almost as insane as he is).

Detective Comics #672Detective Comics #672

(Did I mention Dixon is one of greatest Joker writers?)

Another madcap satire, ‘More Edge More Heart’ (Catwoman #20) opens with a shot of the film Lethal Honey III, full of busty, bikini-clad babes shooting automatic weapons, framed by Catwoman’s quip: ‘Movie people are always saying that their industry is almost a hundred years old. So why is it still in puberty?’

It only gets better from there.

Catwoman (v2) #20Catwoman (v2) #20

In this hilarious story arc, a sleazy producer hires Catwoman to steal a screenplay from the successful competition in order get a knock-off production ready in time for the blockbuster’s release. This leads to a wonderful payoff in the second part, ‘Box Office Poison.’

By repeatedly having fun at the expense of the film industry, Chuck Dixon isn’t just displaying his interest and knowledge regarding the inner workings of the movie business. He is also partaking (deliberately, I assume) in a long tradition of love/hate parodies of this milieu – a subgenre that’s part of the industry’s own history, as seen in films such as Victor Fleming’s Bombshell, Robert Altman’s The Player, David Mamet’s State and Main, and the Coen brothers’ Hail, Caeser!, not to mention Quentin Tarantino’s uneven Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood.

Speaking of Tarantino, Dixon penned one of the weirdest riffs on Pulp Fiction, starring a couple of talking gorillas:

Batman Annual #23Batman Annual #23Batman Annual #23

(Naturally, there was also a Planet of the Apes joke in this issue.)

While Chuck Dixon’s cinephilia is probably shared by most of his colleagues, the same doesn’t necessarily hold true for his political leanings. Dixon is an increasingly outspoken conservative who seems to support Donald Trump (even though I assume there is something tongue-in-cheek about the fact that he wrote a Trump’s Space Force comic).

I’ve seen him downplay the influence ideology has on his comics because they’re allegedly not political, in the sense that they deal with escapist fiction about heroes with broad, universal values. I’m quite wary of this understanding of politics, but even if you go with a relatively narrow definition you have to admit Dixon has tackled a number of hot topics, especially in Robin, which dramatized teen issues such as gun violence, sexual assault, school bullying, unwanted pregnancy, and alcoholism.

What you can argue – and many have – is that Dixon tends to respect each franchise’s history and themes, hence he has written Batman stories that are ultimately geared against the death penalty or in favor of gun control, despite being a member of the NRA…

Robin (v4) #43Robin (v4) #43

There is no doubt that the Chuck Dixon who showed up for work at DC was first and foremost a storyteller, not a polemicist. For the most part, his scripts served the narrative without preaching. After all, despite his flair for gung-ho action, Dixon has always understood that moral complexity and nuance are the grist of compelling drama. You can see this, for instance, in ‘The Villain’ (Birds of Prey #7), where Black Canary tries to save an exiled Latin American dictator, only to realize that the world of international politics can be way more complicated than good guys versus bad guys.

Overall, I’d say his comics aren’t likely to upset liberal Batman fans, except for those who find it hard to engage with work on its own terms when it’s done by creators who have said or done problematic things – an attitude that does seem to be spreading, as seen in the recent controversy over Roman Polanski’s An Officer and a Spy (although in that case the alternative is pretty easy: if you’re interested in the story but don’t want to watch the film because of its director, get your hands on Robert Harris’ original novel, which is a fine read).

Even when Dixon occasionally indulged in right-wing tropes such as mobbed up unions, ethnic gangs, and eagerly pro-abortion planned parenthood counsellors, or when he took small jabs at the Democrats (for example, in Detective Comics #708 and Birds of Prey: Revolution), these didn’t distract from the main story.

Robin (v4) #94Robin (v4) #94

Mostly, though, I think what makes it work isn’t that Dixon kept his politics out of comics, but that he integrated them in smooth, satisfying ways that didn’t feel forced. While he played along with the progressive elements of the Batman narrative (his Caped Crusader kept going out of his way to save the Joker’s life), he also embraced its more reactionary side (like the constant indictment of the system’s leniency towards criminals). He wisely left the most anti-PC jabs for Harvey Bullock. And when his Robin expressed a concern with traditional family values (while talking to Spoiler about the possibility of her becoming a single mother) or his Batman showed respect and admiration for religious faith, these scenes didn’t come across as ham-fisted. They didn’t clash with the characters or the stories…

For example, check out this nice little moment after Gotham City was devastated by an earthquake:

Detective Comics #724Detective Comics #724Detective Comics #724

(The one exception is the underwhelming one-shot The Chalice, a contrived Christian tale in which it turns out Bruce Wayne descends from a long line of protectors of the Holy Grail… Even the usual cameos feel clunky in this one. I wouldn’t mind a Batman version of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, but sadly The Chalice isn’t it.)

I’ll make a similar case for Chuck Dixon’s underrated forays into slapstick: it’s not that they were apolitical, it’s that the way they incorporated politics was often pretty funny. The most remarkable example is ‘Desolation Again’ (Green Arrow #110), in which the latest versions of Green Lantern and Green Arrow went looking for the former’s father in the town of Desolation, where their predecessors had fought for social justice in defense of exploited miners back in 1970 (in the classic Green Lantern #77, by Denny O’Neil and Neal Adams). The joke was that they now found an affluent Desolation, which had become ‘the lawsuit capital of America.’ As a local explained to them: ‘Lots of folks in town sued the mining company and got major cash rewards. Almost everybody in the county hit the litigation jackpot.’ Suing each other had thus become the basis of the local economy.

Green Arrow (v2) #110Green Arrow (v2) #110

Mocking a culture of excessive litigation is typically associated with the Right – and there is definitely something provocative about doing it in a story that explicitly calls back to one of the most famous leftist runs in the history of comic books. Yet the caricature is so amusingly over-the-top that I can’t help laughing along!

The same goes for several gags in Chuck Dixon’s more Batman-related work…

Birds of Prey #10Birds of Prey #10

(You can see why Dixon went on to write Simpsons comics!)

The one area where Chuck Dixon felt comfortable addressing politics more thoroughly was in the international arena – in part because his views in this field weren’t as out-of-step with the mainstream, and in part because there are so many fictitious countries in the DCU that you have a pretty wide leeway to play around. Most notably, Birds of Prey starred a globetrotting Black Canary who kept travelling to places with names like Markovia and Koroscova. There was even an arc set against the background of a Middle Eastern crisis (#15-17) which revisited an old storyline about the Joker being a former diplomat from Qurac (originally Iran).

Several of Dixon’s comics engaged with the fallout from the breakdown of the Soviet Union, going back to the 1993 mini-series Robin: Cry of the Huntress, which introduced Ariana Dzerchenko, a teen of Ukrainian descent who went on to become Tim Drake’s girlfriend. Her father owned a printshop in Little Odessa, Gotham’s Russian neighborhood, and was attacked by the Commissar, a mobster who wanted him to forge EU money before the original currency actually went into circulation!

Robin: Cry of the HuntressRobin (v3) #1

The Commissar was part of The Hammer – the USSR’s secret services branch that had created the master assassin KGBeast. The Hammer had gone criminal after the Soviet collapse and was now involved in heroin smuggling, gambling, extortion, and murder for hire.

Robin: Cry of the HuntressRobin (v3) #3

Indeed, Chuck Dixon’s comics typically displayed quite a cynical view of the messy post-Soviet transition – like in 1994, when he brought together a group of ex-communists-turned-criminals:

Robin (v4) #12Robin (v4) #12Robin (v4) #12

This group went on to threaten Gotham City with a small nuke in the thrilling crossover ‘Troika’ (Batman #515, Shadow of the Bat #35, Detective Comics #682, Robin #14), half of which was written by Dixon. It turned out they all had different views on how to adapt (or not) to capitalism and ended up spending almost as much time double-crossing each other as fighting the Dynamic Duo!

Dixon often took his characters to the post-Soviet side of the world. For example, in the neat mini-series Birds of Prey: Manhunt, Black Canary chased an ex-KGB agent into a criminal hideout in Kazakhstan (also a setting in Bane: Conquest). On the pages of Catwoman, the titular thief was hired by the US government to steal the crown of Prinz Willem Augen Kapreallian, heir to the no longer existent throne of Transbelvia, ‘one of the micro-republics left over when the Soviet Union broke up.’ The Americans hoped to return the crown to the Transbelvian Cultural Ministry and secure at least one ally in the former Eastern Bloc, but, after many twists and turns, the prince captured Catwoman and tried to force her to marry him, culminating in a ceremony bursting with mayhem, as the bride, the groom, US spies, and Corsican mobsters all shot at each other (Catwoman #15-18). Later, Robin travelled to Transbelvia as well, trying to prevent a military conflict (Robin #50-52), and so did Black Canary, who found herself in the DC version of the Yugoslav Wars (Birds of Prey #18).

Some of these comics can get pretty grim (not unlike Dixon’s similarly themed The Punisher: River of Blood), but you can also find in them Dixon’s acerbic wit. In particular, he got a fair bit of mileage out the playful clash of cultures and ideologies…

Robin (v3) #3Robin (v3) #3
Posted in WRITERS OF BATMAN COMICS | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment