Spotlight on Lucky Luke, 1958-1967 – part 1

Once again, it’s that time of year when I revisit Eurocomics that marked my childhood, now read through older eyes, and write about some of the dimensions I missed as a kid. Today, I’ll focus on the first decade of the classic run of the comedy western series Lucky Luke written by the French René Goscinny and illustrated by the Belgian Morris, back in the late 1950s and 1960s, when it was originally published in the anthology magazine Le Journal de Spirou.

The Wagon Train

Lucky Luke went through a tremendous evolution during this run. René Goscinny’s early collaborations with Morris were still fairly basic in terms of plotting. Joss Jamon’s Gang and The Dalton Cousins are mostly a string of gags pitting Lucky Luke against the titular criminal gangs – the former being a band of renegades from the recent Civil War (including a slimy, spineless Peter Lorre lookalike) and the latter the cousins of the Dalton brothers who had died in a previous album (Outlaws).

The Dalton Cousins

The Daltons would end up becoming the series’ most recurrent villains (hell, other than Luke’s horse Jolly Jumper, they’re by far the most recurrent characters!), soon returning to the spotlight, starting with The Dalton’s Escape and On the Dalton’s Trail. The latter album, in fact, pretty much consolidated a classic dynamic: the Daltons escape from prison (usually in a silly way, since prison security is about as tight as in Arkham Asylum) and are chased by Lucky Luke with the ‘help’ of the prison hound dog Rin-Tin-Can (Rantanplan in the original), the dumbest canine of the West (and a jokey take on the German Shepherd/silent cinema star Rin-Tin-Tin) constantly derided by Jolly Jumper (whose sarcastic thoughts we get to read). Joe, the shortest of the Daltons and their de facto leader, became obsessed with getting revenge on Lucky Luke, and Averell, the tallest one, was not only amusingly thick but also frequently hungry.

While specific elements only solidified across time, you can tell Goscinny and Morris knew they’d struck gold as early as The Dalton Cousins. They clearly recognized that these four bandits, with ascending heights and ascending stupidity, lent themselves both to broad humor playing on their dumb meanness and to visual gags playing on their physiques:

The Dalton Cousins

Yet it was in the next album, The Judge, that Lucky Luke really found its groove, taking inspiration from real-life – and folk legend – saloon keeper / justice of the peace Roy Bean. Proclaiming himself ‘the Only Law West of the Pecos,’ Roy Bean had become a popular character whose notion of exercising justice largely consisted of extorting money and condemning people to do his chores. For instance, according to Morris’ introduction: ‘An old folk song tells the story of how ‘the judge’ led an investigation when the body of a man killed in an accident was found. Inspecting the corpse in order to identify him, Bean only found a revolver and 41.5 dollars. He seized the gun and fined the dead man $41.5 for possession of a firearm without a licence…’

With such an eccentric character to build on, Goscinny and Morris had a field day turning the courtroom into something out of a W.C. Fields movie:

The Judge

The Judge is an ode to western mythology. Not only does it expand Roy Bean’s legend, but it ends in a sweet note praising the fun generated by folklore figures like him.

This is more the exception than the rule, though. As much as Morris loved American culture and had grown up idealizing the cowboy lifestyle, he didn’t buy into the romanticization of the Old West myths. If popular culture had a sympathetic take on outlaws like Jesse James and Billy the Kid (while demonizing sheriff Pat Garrett), Lucky Luke set out to ridicule them – and Morris found in Goscinny someone who shared his iconoclasm.

Take Billy the Kid, for instance. Playing with his nickname, the series presented Billy as an actual kid (very quick with the gun but ultimately childish), which led to a spin on The Twilight Zone’s episode ‘It’s a Good Life:’

Billy the Kid

As you can see, Lucky Luke didn’t just take the piss out of the spoiled brat Billy the Kid, but out of the whole subservient town as well. Indeed, the series is a cartoony parody of the whole notion of a country of tough macho men hardened by frontier life: although one of my favorite running gags is how cities always have a badass sign at the entry announcing how deadly they are (‘Stranger, if your intentions are bad, we’ll change your mind… with lead.’), almost all of them turn out to be full of cowards and bumbling fools (it’s essentially the comic book equivalent of Blazing Saddles, albeit with less sex jokes).

One of the albums that takes this to a particularly hilarious extreme is The Daltons Redeem Themselves, where the Daltons get out on parole and find it impossible to go straight because people keep throwing money at them and running away every time they see them! Another one is The Escort, where Lucky Luke has to escort Billy the Kid from Texas to New Mexico for a court hearing, sowing chaos wherever they go because even a handcuffed Billy is enough to scare the crap out of everyone around them…

The Escort is rare in that it is a direct sequel of a previous album. By and large, Goscinny didn’t care about continuity. Lucky Luke’s stories are all self-contained (they always end with Luke riding towards the sunset), follow no chronological order (Luke deals with historical events and figures from the late 19th century, but the sequence is all over the place), and there are practically no recurring characters other than the Daltons (and certainly no character development), so you can pick up almost any album without concern for what happened before. Hell, the early comics contain multiple references to Jesse James and Calamity Jane that do not match those characters’ later appearances at all, but nobody bothers to explain this inconsistency. The whole thing is a slapstick comedy anyway, so it doesn’t take itself too seriously outside of some internal coherence within each book.

Calamity Jane

Lucky Luke is much kinder towards Calamity Jane than towards Billy the Kid, perhaps in order to compensate for the series’ very poor track record when it came to female characters. Up until 1966, there were virtually no women in significant roles – and the few women that did show up were confined to traditional stereotypes (a brief moment in The Rivals of Painful Gulch actually suggested that women’s peripheral status helped explain why this West was so ‘wild’ and stupid, positing that women were the marginalized voice of reason in a world of feuding and brawling men).

Calamity Jane is one of the albums I most compulsively reread when growing up – in part because I enjoyed seeing Lucky Luke in detective mode, and in part because Calamity Jane herself was such a charismatic figure. Sure, the central joke is precisely how un-ladylike the titular character behaves, so the humor ends up underscoring the exceptionality of Calamity Jane’s boisterous posture, although the album does treat her with sympathy and respect. I wouldn’t go so far as to call the book feminist, but it’s interesting to note that gender expectations are actually a key theme throughout: besides variety among the female cast, there are also quite different types of masculinity (including an effete gentleman modeled after David Niven who undergoes quite an evolution…), thus both celebrating and laughing at diversity.

Gender representation is hardly the only non-PC aspect of René Goscinny’s run. For instance, 1961’s Steaming Up the Mississippi (about a race between two steamboats along the titular river) contains plenty of depictions of outrageously lazy, coward, subservient, minstrel-looking black people, including a cheery guy named Sam whose job is to pour coffee to Ned – ‘the best pilot and liar in the Mississippi’ – every time he tells one of his fanciful stories…

Steaming Up the Mississippi

Seen today, certainly much of the sequence on this scan feels cringeworthy, starting with the (depressingly realistic) way Lucky Luke ignores Sam when walking into the cabin. Sure, it’s a European book taking the piss out of American racism (Look! They even have a black guy whose sole purpose is to serve them coffee!) and the low-level workers’ preference for doing as little as possible can be seen as a form of defiance, with the final panel above even conveying a gentle appreciation of African-American musical culture… but it also taps into awkward tropes about laziness and hedonism.

The fine line between mocking stereotypes and reproducing them has given many a headache to the editors at Cinebook, who have been publishing these comics in English (some of them for the very first time). 2021’s edition of Steaming Up the Mississippi opens with an apologetic forward, including this piece of contextualization:

“Neither Morris nor Goscinny could be accused of deliberate racism. Goscinny was Jewish but kept the fact out of the public eye as much as possible. Only 16 years after the end of the Second World War, he was well aware of the danger of racial or ethnic stereotyping, and his use of such clichés was aimed at disarming and ridiculing them. But both he and Morris were still products of the society they lived in, and even the best-intentioned among us, even now, can be strongly opposed to racism and still not realise the egregious nature of some of our actions, words or attitudes – and the harm they can do to those directly affected by them.”

Cinebook’s team have used the freedom of translation to polish some of the roughest edges while avoiding interventions that drastically change the content. In Steaming Up the Mississippi, Sam now calls the pilot ‘Ned’ rather than ‘boss’ (unlike in the original text), suggesting a relation based on a degree of horizontal complicity rather than mere vertical subservience evocative of slavery. Other books use the more respectful term ‘Native Americans’ when translating the French equivalent of ‘redskins’ (although preserving the constant references to their notoriously low tolerance to alcohol). And if you compare the coloring of Calamity Jane with the one in the French edition (at least with the album I got, which has a few decades), you’ll notice a Chinese character’s skin was originally rendered in a much more dehumanizing bright yellow:

Calamity Jane (French edition)

To be fair, while such terms, stereotypes, and artwork may sound insensitive today, in Lucky Luke they don’t seem informed by malice. These albums are unabashedly cheerful, taking recognizable tropes and exaggerating them to comically outlandish proportions.

In Tortillas for the Daltons, nobody is goofier than the North-American Daltons and Rin-Tin-Can, but the comic also has its fun with broad caricatures of the Mexican as poor, siesta-loving, easygoing peasants:

Tortillas for the Daltons

Other albums did the same with the humble, quaint-speaking Chinese launderers…

The 20th Cavalry

…and even with the polite, authority-respecting Canadians…

The Daltons in the Blizzard

…not to mention, unsurprisingly, with all kinds of Native Americans, including their allusive names and a vocabulary that often required lengthy descriptions of new objects for which they didn’t previously have a simple term:

The 20th Cavalry

When it came to the Sioux, the joke was not just to exaggerate their reputation for war (the chief is obsessed with scalps), but also to defang their feared image by presenting each tribe member as a bit of a klutz:

The Wagon Train

The latter gesture culminates in a great sequence that pushes humorous inversion to the next level. The 1964 album The Wagon Train revisits a classic setup, with the Sioux surrounding and attacking a caravan of settlers that rearranges itself into a protective circle. Rather than a scary or dramatic confrontation, however, the book plays the whole thing for laughs as various characters outright refuse to act the part expected of them in traditional narratives…

The Wagon Train

Indeed, if Cinebook decided to publish these albums regardless of their objectionable and possibly upsetting caricatures, it’s probably because of an appreciation for the fact that they are nevertheless outstanding comics in terms of craft… and, often, pretty darn funny.

What made Steaming Up the Mississippi one of my favorite albums as a kid wasn’t the racial dimension but rather Ned’s riotous descriptions of the Mississippi and all the exciting obstacles Lucky Luke had to face in the boat race, from saboteurs to outlandishly sudden floods and droughts (‘The Mississippi’s one fickle old man… One time I saw it rise, then fall so quickly that the fish stayed up in the air before falling and cracking their skulls on the dry riverbed…’).

Heck, for all the outdated stereotypes and occasional forays into black humor, there is still something relatively wholesome about Lucky Luke in the 1950s and ‘60s. Goscinny’s run mocks vices like gambling, brawling, and excessive alcohol consumption while often presenting schools as the ultimate sign of progress.

Crucially, Lucky Luke himself is consistently framed as a somewhat classic, un-deconstructed hero, defending visionaries and/or underdogs. He’s pretty much a straightforward embodiment of the archetype of the brave, lonesome, laconic drifter (even if he occasionally carries out missions for the government).

And yet, he’s not the brooding type. Rather, Luke often seems to be enjoying himself, especially when dealing with Rin-Tin-Can…

The Daltons in the Blizzard

Yep, it’s a far cry from the cynical, gritty anti-heroes of revisionist takes on the genre…

In fact, one of Lucky Luke’s defining features is that he chooses not to kill his opponents (even though he can draw faster than his own shadow, has a pitch-perfect aim, and is pretty good with his fists). This trait may have started out as a concession in order to make the books more kid-friendly, but it generates my favorite kind of stories, where the hero has to constantly *outsmart* the villains.

Steaming Up the Mississippi

The scene above is a running joke throughout the series. Instead of killing each other, Lucky Luke and his opponents constantly deployed ludicrous, non-lethal ways of showcasing their awesome shooting skills.

To be fair, it’s yet another classic setup that has been used in all sorts of westerns and proto-westerns across the decades – and I’m always glad to see new variations on this old motif…

Starlord #12

It’s not just that Lucky Luke doesn’t kill, it’s that his missions typically revolve around instilling morality and protecting – or even helping implement – ‘civilized’ institutions… but this is done in a funny rather than preachy way. René Goscinny isn’t trying to teach you a lesson as much as he’s playing with familiar archetypes, including Luke as the justice-seeking ‘white hat’ cowboy.

Take The Rivals of Painful Gulch. In that album, Lucky Luke arrives at a town where two families – the large-nosed O’Timmins and the big-eared O’Haras – hate each other to death and he agrees to help because their constant fights are ruining the town’s ability to progress (each clan keeps sabotaging every new infrastructure to prevent their rival from benefitting from it). Although the families are obviously Irish caricatures, the tale can be seen as an entertaining parable about racism and prejudice in general. But it also feels like a gloriously wacky counterpoint to Sergio Leone’s Fistful of Dollars (which came out two years after this album) – rather than destroying the town’s clans by pitting them against each other, Lucky Luke has to psychologically manipulate them into getting along!

And then, of course, there is the scene from On the Dalton’s Trail where Luke actually saves Joe Dalton from getting lynched…

On the Dalton’s Trail

The key point of the scene is not to romanticize Lucky Luke’s idealism. This is just who he is: standing up for law and order is consistent with his overall characterization. What makes it hilarious is the contrast with the cowardly sheriff, not to mention Joe Dalton’s humiliation (we know how pissed off Jow must be, owing his life to Luke).

Plus, the scene sets up another one, later on, which pushes Joe Dalton’s position to an even more comical extreme:

On the Dalton’s Trail

Next week, I’ll dive a bit deeper into the politics of Goscinny’s run.

Posted in WILD WEST | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

COMICS CAN BE AWESOME (29 April 2024)

This week, a reminder that comic book covers can be FUN:

Posted in AWESOME COVERS | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Some thoughts on Alex Garland’s Civil War

Just some loose thoughts on the Civil War film… No, not the MCU one, I’m talking about the one set in a dystopia where secessionist states are fighting against the US president.

Matt Zoller Seitz has summed up the initial reactions to Civil War: ‘(1) an alternative future history of a divided United States that’s intended as a cautionary tale; (2) a technically proficient but empty-headed misery porn compendium that derives much of its power from images redolent of genocide and/or lynching, but ducks political specifics so as not to offend reactionaries; or (3) a visionary spectacular with ultra-violence that might or might not have something important to say but will definitely look and sound great on an expensive home entertainment system.’

I don’t fully share any of these perspectives. Civil War doesn’t strike me as a cautionary tale as much as the kind the film that, by anticipating some elements of what’s to come, is bound to be remembered and referenced in the same way all those old disaster movies or thrillers about terrorism in New York gained a retroactive resonance after covid-19 or 9/11. As near-future history, though, it’s not particularly believable: if there is a breakdown of the US, it seems more likely to entail deep internal division and conflict between factions within communities (Trump voters live next door, not just in some conveniently separated geographic area) rather than what we see in the film, which is a fairly conventional war between states/military forces.

As is often the case, I find it more interesting to consider how the movie uses past events, as it relocates to the US imagery from wars in Germany, Vietnam, Iraq, etc, so that what seemed remote now seems close and blended. By simultaneously evoking estrangement and recognition, Civil War may perhaps suggest to Americans the feeling of witnessing from the inside those societies’ collapse… or of witnessing such collapse through the outside lens of foreign correspondents. It’s not so much a challenging statement as yet another reminder of how differently Western empathy works towards privileged places in comparison to sites like Gaza.

2000 AD #81

On the picture’s ostensible apolitical stance, i.e. the way it avoids taking sides while emptying the conflict of discernible ideologies and reducing the backstory to vague allusions, well, this is actually something I liked: I went in fearing a preachy polemic, so I found Civil War’s minimalist world-building, close-to-the-ground storytelling, and relatively spare dialogue to be refreshing and stimulating.

The main reason for this choice may have been cynical commercial interest and political cowardice, trying not to alienate too many possible target audiences, but the result is nevertheless thought-provoking. The fact that the ambiguous scenario can be read both ways, as either a revolt against a Trump figure or as a right-wing coalition elevating January 6th to the next level (the sequence with Jesse Plemons is the only one that conveys clear ideological stakes, but it remains uncertain which side he’s fighting for or if he has just gone rogue) signals the political confusion and the very unpredictability of our current moment.

Likewise, by exploiting and sensationalizing graphic violence, including that of real-world tragedies, the film reflects the attitude of the central characters, a group of desensitized reporters more concerned with thrills and aesthetics than with the political implications or the actual suffering they depict. If Civil War is about anything, it’s about the cold distance of sensationalist war-related journalism, which is not to say that it has anything new or deep to say… Indeed, more than the superficial politics, I was struck by the superficial take on photojournalism, with everybody treating photos as if they don’t have angles or meanings or points of view – they’re just ‘great’ when they look impressive and shocking.

Scout Handbook

This brings us to (3), that is to say, to the notion that Civil War is best appreciated as a visceral rather than cerebral experience, providing a string of perversely entertaining set pieces, enhanced by the provocative context but not necessarily at its service. Unlike what the poster and trailer might suggest, this is not a dumb blockbuster drawing on obvious American icons to stage a relentless orgy of spectacular action and large-scale destruction but rather something closer in style to Alfonso Cuarón’s Children of Men. Still, it’s a tense, immersive road movie where every stop involves a new mystery and obstacle, so the most satisfying way to enjoy it is perhaps on a moment-by-moment basis, hanging out with these characters instead of theorizing about the bigger picture.

This matches my general approach to Alex Garland, whom I think consistently uses ambitious high concepts to fuel moody yet functional genre pieces, frustrating those in search of insightful science fiction while rewarding those (like me) for whom the smart elements are a bonus adorning stylish sci-fi adventures. So, underneath the Tarkovsky veneer, just as 28 Days Later was a post-apocalyptic zombie flick, Sunshine a slasher in outer space, Dredd a cyberpunk action fest, Ex Machina a chamber piece psychological thriller, Annihilation a – flawed yet compelling – slow-burn monster-hunting shooter, Devs a spy-fi yarn, and Men a psychedelic body horror riff (which eventually loses its way precisely by pushing the allegorical dimension), Civil War boils down to a solid war movie with an edgy twist.

The thing is that, even with adjusted expectations, Garland’s film is neither particularly original in terms visuals nor especially involving in terms of characterization (despite the nice performances, in particular Kirsten Dunst, who comes across as truly broken and tired). The notion of the US as a modern battlefield was memorably mined in the preposterously silly Red Dawn, forty years ago, and you can find much more complex, fleshed out war correspondents in Under Fire, to cite two of Gotham Calling’s top Cold War films.

East of West #1

I get why some viewers – especially critics – would demand more. A24 productions have such a serious, pretentious tone that they keep hinting towards something sophisticated and meaningful, yet not always living up to that promise. Recently, the company was behind Zone of Interest, Jonathan Glazer’s controversial historical drama about the domestic family life of Auschwitz’s commandant (whose house was right next to the concentration camp), which actually has a few points of contact with Civil War: both thematize people’s ability to accept and coexist with carnage; both eschew exposition-laden conversations, relying heavily on – and ultimately exploring – our own previous understanding of the world (even if Zone of Interest keeps the Holocaust’s physical violence offscreen, poignantly dramatizing the ‘out of sight, out of mind’ inclination, while Civil War shamelessly recreates that violence, illustrating how even images of death and pain come to be accepted).

By now, we’ve all seen countless versions of the destruction of the United States, many of them much more imaginative than what you find here. For instance, the maps I’ve used in this post come from comics that did it in a more maximalist – and surrealist – fashion. I find them all very cool and fun, but I suppose what sets Civil War apart, at the end of the day, is precisely its low-key vibe, as if underlining how mundane and increasingly familiar this prospect has come to feel.

I’m certainly not the first to point out that apocalyptic fiction has become less and less futuristic. Then again, as Ursula K. Le Guin put it as far back as 1969, in the introduction to The Left Hand of Darkness, classic sci-fi has always tended to be more descriptive than predictive: ‘The weather bureau will tell you what next Tuesday will be like, and the Rand Corporation will tell you what the twenty-first century will be like. I don’t recommend that you turn to the writers of fiction for such information. It’s none of their business. All they’re trying to do is tell you what they’re like, and what you’re like – what’s going on – what the weather is now, today, this moment, the rain, the sunlight, look!’

Give Me Liberty #4

Posted in WEBS OF FICTION | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

COMICS CAN BE AWESOME (22 April 2024)

Another reminder that comic book covers can be awesome… and another tribute to renditions of facial acting and the art of the close-up:

Posted in AWESOME COVERS | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Some thoughts on 21st-century spy shows

Secret agents and international intrigue have really come back with a vengeance in the past decade or so. The War on Terror and, later, the renewed tension between the West and Russia seem to have stimulated the public’s appetite for this sort of material, now updated to an era where surveillance technology makes some of the old spy-fi devices appear quaint in comparison.

When it comes to smart entertainment that mixes intricate plots, engaging characterization, and ripped-from-the-headlines geopolitics, the biggest juggernauts were Homeland (2011-2020) and The Bureau (2015-2020). I was particularly fond of the latter, a neo-noirish narrative about a division of the French Secret Services specialized in cover stories, or ‘legends,’ weaving a tapestry of missions involving a million different political forces in the Middle East.

Elegantly emanating le Carré-esque reservation and authenticity, The Bureau’s main emphasis was on the low-key aspects of spycraft (dissimulation, psychological manipulation, technological surveillance), although this was often tied to the violence on the ground, particularly in the war against ISIS. In fact, the action became more visually daring as the series progressed, including a number of remarkable set pieces (the Israeli hit squad in the hotel corridor, the wall-breaking operation through a ravaged Mosul…). Things got especially grim in the final season, with a string of crushing moments and broken characters (yet also much more sex).

It is worth noting that a few smaller productions were just as solid, like 2021’s Vigil, which pursued a mystery set in a nuclear submarine. Alas, the second season (a new mystery, now largely set in a Persian Gulf base and revolving around combat drones) was much less impressive…

At the moment, the finest specimen of this breed is probably The Diplomat, which revolves around the US ambassador in the UK trying to prevent the British from going to war in the Middle East (a nice historical twist, cleverly playing on post-Iraq/Afghanistan wars, post-Trump, and post-Brexit anxieties). The Diplomat was created by Debora Cahn, who brings in the craft she honed scripting The West Wing and Homeland into yet another political thriller that takes for granted the audience’s familiarity with government workings and contemporary hot topics while pitting a bunch of charismatic characters against each other in complex games of diplomacy and intelligence (in both senses of the word). Geopolitics have really caught up with this one, though, so I’m guessing the next season will take place in some kind of alternate reality where their ersatz-Prigozhin can remain alive and where genocidal war in the Middle East remains a looming threat rather than a consummated fact.

If The Diplomat has more of a sitcom vibe, the same goes for another one of my favorites among the latest crop of spy shows. Slow Horses focuses on an MI5 unit made up almost entirely out of second-rate agents who have screwed up in the past. To be sure, with source material as good as Mick Herron’s novels, all you have to do is try to stay relatively faithful, breathing life into the various eccentric characters and witty dialogue, even if necessarily sacrificing the text’s droll descriptions (‘The minister at the time had been every senior spook’s wet dream: spineless, indecisive, terrified of bad press, and anxious never to be caught in the vicinity of a decelerating buck.’). Still, it would be unfair to reduce the show to a serviceable adaptation – it has developed its own groove and rhythm (helped by Mick Jagger’s absolutely kickass theme song). It also has a stellar cast, starting with Gary Oldman as the team’s outrageously abusive boss, Jackson Lamb.

Since Oldman played the spymaster George Smiley in 2011’s film version of Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, it is hard not to see his performance on an intertextual level – Lamb is like a dark reflection of Smiley, more vulgar and certainly less diplomatic, but likewise exhibiting the sharpness of an old cold warrior. And I reckon it’s not the only nod to the genre’s past: the second season opens in a porn shop (like Conrad’s Secret Agent) and contains a leg-torture scene (like Inglourious Basterds), even though it drops much of the novel’s Die Hard-ish subplot.

That season, in fact, does more streamlining than the first one, trailing further away from Herron and actually replacing a few key twists. Overall, I don’t mind: the changes actually made it a more stimulating viewing experience for me, as I had read the book (Dead Lions) and so I got to enjoy a story with some extra surprises. That said, I did miss the novel’s lovely denouement, where sleeper agents become a sort of metaphor for immigration and integration. (It was also a pity that the next season omitted the very final scene of the third novel, Real Tigers, one of Lamb’s most badass moments…)

Overall, these are good times for aficionados of cool spy fiction. Even if you want something less concerned with geopolitics than with the escapist dimension of accessing a secret underworld operating in the shadows of our mundane life, there is plenty to choose from. Those that lean towards sci-fi can enjoy intelligent hybrids thanks to the likes of Counterpart (what I wouldn’t give for a third season) or even Andor. For those who prefer a more playful tone, there’s the mellow indie romcom Mr. & Mrs. Smith (2024), not to mention the twisted cat-and-mouse games of Killing Eve (2018-2022).

The latter, about an obsessive hunt across Europe for a psychopathic hitwoman, had a steady supply of neat needle drops and stylish directorial choices (like the intense dance floor attack in the third episode or the tracking shot at the beginning of season 2) to go along with the zippy writing. The result was so darkly funny – and, sure, sometimes just plain dark – that it’s no wonder the initial showrunner Phoebe Waller-Bridge was hired to polish the script for No Time to Die (that film is quite a mixed bag, but you can sense Waller-Bridge’s mark in the very fun sequence in Cuba).

In this regard, last year’s Citadel is probably the one that took things farthest. This is as superficial a genre piece as you are likely to find, following ultra-secret agencies (for whom the CIA and the MI6 are ‘minor leagues’) involved in a shadow war that has shaped modern human history, which we get to uncover through the eyes of an amnesiac super-agent forced back in the game. The show feels like what would happen if you gave a very generous budget to a screenwriter whose whole only knowledge of the world came from Bond, Bourne and M:I movies… In fact, it covers pretty much the same ground and plot shenanigans as the recent film comedy Argyle, but whereas there the stale, broad humor was loudly telegraphed and insultingly hammered home at every turn (except for a bit of inspired lunacy towards the end), Citadel isn’t necessarily pitched to the lowest common denominator… For every piece of dialogue that resembles a placeholder, there are enough moments when the show seems to be giddily testing how far it can push its circuitous narrative, demanding attention rather than mere recognition.

I don’t mind the derivative aspects, which Citadel pulls off with gusto, bombarding us with high-pitched action (especially John Woo-ish gun fu), quippy exchanges (full of f-boms, giving it an even more adolescent flair), and an extra twist always waiting around the corner.  Compared to any of the other shows I mentioned, however, there is very little to hold on to in terms of emotionally engaging characterization or any connection at all to the outside world… The agents’ globetrotting adventures take them from one postcard location to the next, but they are so removed from actual ideologies or international affairs that the whole thing becomes quite abstract, as if emptying espionage of everything except for pulpy thrills. The result is pure, trashy, disposable fun.

It’s exactly the sort of breezy take on super-spies you can find in Dynamite’s James Bond 007 comics, including the recent books written by Philip Kennedy Johnson (which strongly benefit from the nifty colors of Dearbhla Kelly, Francesco Segala, and Claudia Giulani):

James Bond 007 – For King and Country #2

Posted in SPYCRAFT & WARFARE | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

COMICS CAN BE AWESOME (15 April 2024)

This week, a reminder that X-Men comics can be surprisingly meaningful and morally complex… but also very, very horny. It’s right there on the covers:

Posted in AWESOME COVERS | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Another damn busy week…

MONDAY

Tenses #2

TUESDAY

Batman & Robin Adventures #10

WEDNESDAY

Batman / Toyman #3

THURSDAY

Batman: Black & White (v3) #4

FRIDAY

Kings of Fear #1

SATURDAY

Batman: Universe #3

SUNDAY

Detective Comics #482

Posted in GOTHAM INTERLUDES | Leave a comment

COMICS CAN BE AWESOME (8 April 2024)

This week’s reminder that comic books can be awesome is yet another tribute to Carmine Infantino’s talent for cover composition:

Posted in GLIMPSES INTO THE PAST | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Other detectives in Gotham City

Back in January, I wrote about Slam Bradley, one of several detectives who share Gotham with the Dark Knight. I don’t mean police detectives – I’m talking about the many private investigators whose cases have brought them into contact with the eccentric crimes of this oddball city… And since Bradley is hardly alone, I’m kicking off an irregular series of posts discussing Batman’s local competition, starting with a couple of funny additions to the cast.

Comics and mystery fiction have had a long relationship. Indeed, one of my favorite subgenres of Batman stories are tales in which the Caped Crusader – also hyperbolically known as the World’s Greatest Detective – uses his intellect to sort out a web of intrigue or to solve a whodunit, especially when some of the rogues show up as suspects or supporting players, like in ‘Broken City’ (Batman #620-625), ‘Dead Reckoning’ (Detective Comics #777-782), and ‘Cold Case’ (Legends of the Dark Knight #201-203), not to mention The Long Halloween.

Like I said in the intro, besides playing the detective himself, Batman sometimes bumps into other (professional and amateur) investigators, who can become allies or turn out to be wild cards pursuing their own agenda. One of those figures, created by Alan Grant and Norm Breyfogle – and who popped up in half a dozen of the former’s comics – is Joe Potato, a deadbeat P.I. (that happens to look like a potato).

Detective Comics #594

Part of what made the schlubby-looking, rough-sounding Joe Potato so instantly entertaining was the juxtaposition of his attitude (he spoke like an old-school gumshoe) with the fact that – let’s face it – he wasn’t especially good at his job… He first showed up in 1988’s ‘Ecstasy’ (Detective Comics #594), where he couldn’t even figure out who his client was, only managed to close the case by following Batman around town, and didn’t even get the rest of his payment in the end!

It would be almost two years until we saw Joe Potato again, in ‘Sisters in Arms’ (Batman #460-461), where he asked the Caped Crusader for help in dismantling a white slavery ring that was smuggling wannabe dancers from Gotham to a Thai brothel (just another addition to the franchise’s long-running obsession with sex work). They teamed up, but Potato wasn’t exactly the most reliable partner… Hell, when Batman went into an office to search for clues, Joe couldn’t even be trusted to wait around in the Batmobile without screwing up:

Batman #460

(Anything that serves as a pretext for Breyfogle to draw an action scene is okay in my book, even when it’s irrelevant to the plot… Yet this sequence isn’t entirely gratuitous: besides the visual delight and comedic relief, it further underscores the stark contrast between the two detectives.)

While the big team-up in ‘Sisters in Arms’ turned out to be between the series’ female characters (Catwoman, Vicki Vale, and the sorely missed Sergeant Sarah Essen), it was amusing to see the ultra-competent Batman given a relatively bumbling sidekick, for a while. That said, Joe Potato wasn’t just a dead weight… He actually got the most sinister line in the whole arc, when facing a member of the slave ring:

Batman #461

In case you’re worried, this object turned out to be a harmless rubber peeler; Joe Potato was just bluffing in order to extract information from the slaver (‘Mrs. Potato’s boy plays strictly by the recipe book!’).

Alan Grant later brought back Potato in Shadow of the Bat (namely in issues #40-41), where he was hired by yet another mysterious client (who turned out to be the vigilante Anarky) and once again bit off more than he could chew (he ended up tied to a zeppelin loaded with explosives). Honestly, it’s a damn shame he didn’t show up more often: I quite like the idea of a clueless, unlucky loser who keeps getting mixed up in Gotham City’s bizarre underworld, never entirely sure about what is going on around him (not unlike Jon Polito in The Big Lebowski).

It wasn’t until Shadow of the Bat Annual #5 that Joe Potato got a proper starring role. That issue was part of DC’s pulp-inspired 1997 annuals, riffing on hardboiled detective fiction and young romance comics with a story deliciously titled “I Was the Love-Slave of a Plant-Based Killer!”

Shadow of the Bat Annual #5

It’s a pretty nifty issue. Joe Potato, down in the dumps (“I’m an ugly guy doin’ an ugly job, and the babes ain’t exactly swoonin’ at my feet”), is hired by Poison Ivy to get an ancient emerald skull and, of course, he falls head over heels for her. As a result, Potato makes one mistake after another as he finds himself fighting for his life against dangerous thugs and monsters, double-crossing the Dark Knight, and both endangering and saving the world, only to wind up heartbroken and alone.  What a send-off!

And if Joe Potato comes across like a playful version of the archetype of the noirish, seasoned private eye (a la Sam Spade, Phillip Marlowe, or Lew Archer), then Beatrice and Penelope Biddee are the franchise’s take on ‘old lady’ amateur investigators, like Miss Marple and Jessica Fletcher.

Detective Comics #634

These two ladies keep bumping into murders and heists, which they then cheerfully investigate on their own, testing evidence in their kitchen. Part of the joke is the contrast between their sweetness and their enthusiastic embrace of a world of violence, as they carry multiple firearms in their pursues and do tests with amyl nitrate while preparing a tea… Yet the joke is also that the Biddee sisters are *not* Miss Marple: according to Batman, they’re infamous for having fucked up a number of police investigations through their interference.

Writer Kelley Puckett introduced the Biddees in ‘The Third Man’ (Detective Comics #634, cover-dated August 1991), a very funny mystery yarn with a sprinkle of international intrigue. Sadly, DC never took advantage of this offbeat pair, although the issue’s manic pace and sheer overflow of ideas probably clinched it in terms of getting Puckett the gig of kicking off – and thus setting the tone for – the Batman Adventures line (which eventually did feature a side-splitting cameo by the sisters, in issue #30).

Both Joe Potato and the Biddee sisters are sadly underused characters, although I like how they nevertheless help build up the franchise’s rich pedigree of fun minor figures populating Gotham City, reminding us that the costumed heroes and villains aren’t the only weird people running around. Next time (whenever that is), I’ll discuss two recurring detectives that left more of a mark.

Posted in GOTHAM CITIZENS | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

COMICS CAN BE AWESOME (1 April 2024)

The subgenre of super-spies seems especially suited for comic books, where there are no budget constraints in terms of depicting gonzo gadgets and glamorous globetrotting, so it’s no wonder we’ve gotten such a long history of James Bond comics, not to mention eccentric variations like the politically charged anthropomorphic animal series Grandville. Marvel jumped on the trend as early as the 1960s, not only with the visually impressive Nick Fury, Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D., but also with the introduction of the Russian spy Natasha Romanova, aka Black Widow. The latter proved to be such an engaging character that she kept gaining greater prominence, whether as a key supporting player in Daredevil and The Avengers or as the star of numerous short-lived series, including a spectacular-looking take not that long ago (cashing in on what turned out to be quite an underwhelming movie). And, sure enough, the Black Widow’s coolness has inspired plenty of awesome covers over the years:

Posted in AWESOME COVERS | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment